Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2011 41(2): 35-43 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2011.011

Analysis of conflict resolution in physical education depending on a teacher's gender

Jože Štihec1, Mateja Videmšek1, Saša Vrbnjak2
1 Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana
2 independent

Background: Although many studies about conflict handling and resolution have so far been conducted, only a limited number of them have delved into the sphere of physical education. The specific nature of work with physical education in certain situations intensifies the occurrence of conflicts. The teacher as an expert in the educational process can, in such cases, provide a good example of how to handle a specific conflict.

Objective: The study aimed to gather information about differences in the resolving of conflict situations which arise during the physical education process between male and female physical education teachers in terms of which conflict resolution strategy they selected and how consistently they applied them.

Methods: For this purpose 158 physical education teachers from randomly selected Slovenian primary schools were surveyed (78 men and 80 women, aged 28-60 years) in April 2010. Teachers at selected schools volunteered to take part in the study and their participation was anonymous. A questionnaire (Bežek, 2000; Štihec, Bežek, Videmšek, & Karpljuk, 2004) with 17 questions was used. The frequencies of responses were calculated. The x2 test was applied at a 5% risk level (p ≤ 0.05) to verify whether there were any differences between male and female physical education teachers in terms of selecting a conflict resolution strategy.

Results: It was established that teachers use various approaches to resolving conflict situations. Most often they take an authoritarian approach ("insisting on one's own opinion"). Statistically significant differences were identified between the results of the male and female physical education teachers in some pedagogical situations in terms of choosing a conflict resolution strategy.

Conclusions: The teachers mainly approach the resolving of conflict situations by "insisting on their own opinion". In the course of resolving a conflict, inconsistencies often occur but are mainly the consequence of the desire to ensure an efficient and the fastest possible elimination of the conflict behaviour. It was also established that in some cases the male physical education teachers differed from their female counterparts in terms of which conflict resolution strategies they selected. In further research some other factors, such as the teacher's age, cultural environment, the teacher's target orientation, the teacher's emotional intelligence andleadership styles could be analysed.

Keywords: primary school, physical education, conflicts, male and female physical education teachers

Prepublished online: December 31, 2011; Published: March 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Štihec, J., Videmšek, M., & Vrbnjak, S. (2011). Analysis of conflict resolution in physical education depending on a teacher's gender. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica, 41(2), 35-43. doi: 10.5507/ag.2011.011
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Anderson, J. W., Foster Kuehn, M., & McKinney, B. C. (1996). Communication skills for surviving conflicts at work. New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc. Cresskill.
    2. Bežek, M. (2000). Reševanje konfliktnih situacij pri športni vzgoji [Conflict resolution in physical education]. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport.
    3. Bjekić, D., & Zlatić, L. (2006). Effects of professional activities on the teachers' communication competences development. In M. Brejc (Ed.), Cooperative partnerships in teacher education, Proceedings of the 31st annual ATEE conference (pp. 163-172). Ljubljana: National School for Leadership in Education.
    4. Bowman, R. J. (2005). A comparison of two models used to predict student strategy choice for classroom conflicts. Kent State University.
    5. Brajša, P. (1993). Pedagoška komunikologija [Pedagogical communicology]. Ljubljana: Glotta Nova.
    6. Brajša, P. (1995). Sedem skrivnosti uspešne šole [Seven secrets of a successful school]. Maribor: Doba.
    7. Deutsch, M. (1976). Konfliktregelung. Muenchen: Reinhardt.
    8. Glasser, W. (1994). Kontrolna teorija. Kako vzpostaviti učin kovito kontrolo nad svojim življenjem [Control theory. How to establish efficient control over oneʼs life]. Ljubljana: Taxus.
    9. Gordon, T. (1981). Familienkonferenz: die Losung von Kon flikten zwischen Eltern und Kind. Reinbek bei Ham burg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
    10. Gordon, T. (1992). Trening večje učinkovitosti za učitelje [Training teachers for better efficiency]. Ljubljana: Coun selling Centre for Children, Adolescents and Parents.
    11. Gross, M. A., & Guererro, L. K. (2000). Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim's organizational conflict styles. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(3), 200-226. Go to original source...
    12. Hammer, M. R. (2005). The intercultural conflict style inventory: A conceptual framework and measure of intercultural conflict resolution approaches. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 675-695. Go to original source...
    13. Havenga, W. (2008). Gender and age differences in conflict management within small businesses. Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 22-28. Go to original source...
    14. Horvat, M. (1998). Pomen konstruktivnega reševanja šolskih konfliktov. Pedagoška obzorja, 19(3/4), 152-159.
    15. Kajtna, T. (2006). Psihološki profil vodilnih slovenskih športnih delavcev [Psychological profile of leading Slovenian sports workers]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Ljubljana.
    16. Kržišnik, R. (2004). Medosebni konf likt kot gibalo osebnega razvoja [Interpersonal conflict as a motive power of personal development]. Human Resource Management Magazine, 2(5), 55-59.
    17. Lee, K. L. (2008). En examination between the relationships of conflict management styles and employeeʼs satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Ma na gement, 3(9), 11-25. Go to original source...
    18. Longaretti, L., & Wilson, J. (20 06). The impact of perceptions on conflict management. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(4), 3-15.
    19. Mahon, J. (2009). Conflict style and cultural understanding among teachers in the western United States: Exploring relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(1), 46-56. Go to original source...
    20. Narimani, M., Agamohammadian, H. R., & Ghaff ari, M. (2008). The survey of the relationship of attachment styles and self efficacy to conflict resolution styles of sport coaches. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(7), 704-709.
    21. Rahim, M. A., Magner, N. R., & Shapiro, D. L. (2000). Do justice perceptions influence styles of handling conflict with supervisors? What justice perceptions, precisely? International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 9-31. Go to original source...
    22. Robbins, S. P. (1989). Training in interpersonal skills. NY: Prentice Hall, Englewood. Cliffs.
    23. Rus, V. S. (1994). Socialna psihologija. Teorija, empirija, eksperiment, uporaba [Social psychology. Theory, empirical aspect, experiment, use]. Ljubljana: Davean.
    24. Somech, A. (2008). Managing conflict in school teams: The impact of task and goal interdependence on con flict management and team effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 359-390. Go to original source...
    25. Štihec, J. (1994). Vloga in pomen komunikacije v pedagoš kem procesu [Role and meaning of communication in the pedagogical process]. Šport, 42(4), 16-18.
    26. Štihec, J., Bežek, M, Videmšek, M., & Karpljuk, D. (2004). An analysis of how to solve conflicts of physi cal education classes. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica, 34(1), 23-30.
    27. Štihec, J., Videmšek, M., Karpljuk, D., Bežek, M., Šeb jan, B., & Vrbnjak, S. (2007). Consistency of selected methods for solving conflicts at classes of physical education. In N. Smajlović (Ed.), Zbornik naučnih i stručnih radova (pp. 465-468). Sarajevo: Univerzitet, Fakultet sporta i tjelesnog odgoja.
    28. Tolar, L., & Katz Jameson, J. (2006). Conflict styles and conflict transformation: Possibilities for new connection. In 19th annual conference of the International Association of Conflict Management. Montreal, Canada. Go to original source...
    29. Zabukovec, V., & Boben, D. (2000). Učitelji in stili vodenja [Teachers and leadership styles]. Ljubljana: Centre for Psychodiagnostic Tools.
    30. Weitzman, E. A., & Weitzman, P. F. (2000). Problem solving and decision making in conflict resolution. In M. Deutsch & P. Coleman (Eds), The handbook of conflict resolution (pp. 185-209). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content