Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2009 39(2): 23-31

Variability of selected indicators of physical activity in a randomized sample of the Czech population between the years 2003-2006: Results from the short and long self administered format of the IPAQ questionnaire

Erik Sigmund, Dagmar Sigmundová, Josef Mitáš, František Chmelík, Jana Vašíčková, Karel Frömel
Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc

Background: The effort to gain worldwide data on the levels of physical activity (PA) of different populations, which would be comparable, led to the creation and standardization of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).

Objective: The main goal of this study is to determine the variability of PA indicators of two equivalent forms of the Czech self administered format of the IPAQ questionnaire applied in a randomized sample of the Czech population between the years 2003-2006.

Methods: A randomized sample of 11277 (5683 females and 5594 males) of the Czech population aged 15-69 took part in the study. The short self administered format of the IPAQ was applied in 2066 women and 1976 men in Fall 2003 and Spring 2004. The long self administered format of the IPAQ (or as a part of the ANEWS questionnaire) was applied to 1688 women and 1689 men in Fall 2004 and Spring 2005 (or in 1929 women and 1929 men in Fall 2005 and Spring 2006). Individual samples of respondents were randomized according to sex, age, and size of the location of residence in compliance with the data from the Czech Statistical Office (www.czso.cz).

Results: There are no significant differences found between men and women in MET-minutes/week in total PA, transportation PA, job related PA and walking as shown by the separately applied long self administered format of the IPAQ and the ANEWS questionnaire (inc. long format of IPAQ). In the self administered format of the IPAQ, we have found both in men and women lower values of total PA (p < 0.0001) than in the long self administered format of the IPAQ or the ANEWS questionnaire. No differences between the values of MET-minutes/week for walking and sitting both in men and women on working days were found in the different forms of the IPAQ questionnaire.

Conclusions: Having used the equivalent forms of the short or long Czech self administered format of the IPAQ questionnaire, we have not found any differences between MET-minutes/week for walking and sitting on working days. The long self administered format of the IPAQ provides more detailed results on PA. However, the value of total PA is significantly higher than that obtained using the short self administered format of the IPAQ. In order to obtain more exact data on PA, we recommend using the long self administered format of the IPAQ simultaneously with pedometer or accelerometer PA monitoring.

Keywords: MET-minutes/week, walking, sitting, short and long IPAQ format

Prepublished online: February 2, 2010; Published: March 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sigmund, E., Sigmundová, D., Mitáš, J., Chmelík, F., Vašíčková, J., & Frömel, K. (2009). Variability of selected indicators of physical activity in a randomized sample of the Czech population between the years 2003-2006: Results from the short and long self administered format of the IPAQ questionnaire. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica39(2), 23-31
Download citation

References

  1. Ain sworth, B. E., Macera, C. A., Jones, D. A., Reis, J. P., Addy, C. L., Bowles, H. R., & Kohl, H. W. (2006). Comparison of the 2001 BRFSS and IPAQ physical activity questionnaire. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38(9), 1584-1592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Alexander, A., Bergman, P., Hangströmer, M., & Sjöström, M. (2006). IPAQ environmental module: Reliability testing. Journal of Public Health, 14(2), 76-80. Go to original source...
  3. Cardinal, R. N., & Aitken, M. R. F. (2006). ANOVA for the behavioural sciences researcher. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Cortina, J. M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. Go to original source...
  5. Craig, C. L., Marshall, A. L., Sjöström, M., Bauman, A. E., Booth, M. L., Ainsworth, B. E., Pratt, U., Ekelund, U., Yngve, A., Sallis, J. F., & Oja, P. (2003). International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12 country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35(8), 1381-1395. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Deng, H. B., Macfarlane, D. J., Thomas, G. N., Lao, X. Q., Jiang, C. Q., Cheng, K. K., & Lam, T. H. (2008). Reliability and validity of the IPAQ - Chinese: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(2), 303-307. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Ekelund, U., Sepp, H., Brage, S., Becker, W., Jakes, R., Hennings, M., & Wareham, N. J. (2006). Criterion related validity of the 7 day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults. Public Health Nutrition, 9(2), 258-265. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Eyler, A. A., Brownson, R. C., Bacak, S. J., & Housemann, R. A. (2003). The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35(9), 1529-1536. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Fogelholm, M., Malmberg, J., Suni, J., Santtila, M., Kyröläinen, H., Mäntysaari, M., & Pekka, O. (2006). International physical activity questionnaire: Validity against fitness. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38(4), 753-760. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Frömel, K., Bauman, A., et al. (2006). Intenzita a objem pohybové aktivity 15-69leté populace České republiky. Česká kinantropologie, 10(1), 13-27.
  11. Frömel, K., Mitáš, J., & Kerr, J. (2009). The associations between active lifestyle, the size of a community and SES of the adult population in the Czech Republic. Health & Place, 15, 447-454. Go to original source...
  12. Guthold, R., Ono, T., Strong, K. L., Chatterji, S., & Morabia, A. (2008). Worldwide variability in physical inactivity: A 51 country survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(6), 486-494. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Hallal, P. C., Victora, C. G., Wells, J. C. K., Lima, R. C., & Valle, N. J. (2004). Comparison of short and full length International Physical Activity Questionnaires. Journal of Physical Activity Health, 1, 227-234. Go to original source...
  14. Hagströmer, M., Oja, P., & Sjöström, M. (2006). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): A study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutrition, 9(6), 755-762. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2001). Chair summary and contents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(6, Suppl), 640-641. Go to original source...
  16. Kurtze, N., Rangul, V., & Hustvedt, B. E. (2008). Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trøndelag health study (HUNT) population of men. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 8-63. Go to original source...
  17. Lee, I. M., & Buchner, D. M. (2008). The importace of walking to public health. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(7, Suppl), 512-518. Go to original source...
  18. Macera, C. A., & Powell, K. E. (2001). Population attributable risk: implications of physical activity dose. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(6, Suppl), 635-639. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Macfarlane, D. J., Lee, C. C. Y., Ho, E. Y. K., Chan, K. L., & Chan, D. T. S. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days). Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 10, 45-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Miles, L. (2007). Physical activity and health. Nutrition Bulletin, 32, 314-363. Go to original source...
  21. Oyeyemi, A. L., Adegoke, B. O. A., Oyeyemi, A. Y., & Fatudimu, B. M. (2008). Test-retest reliability of IPAQ environmental - module in an African population. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 38(5), 1-7. Go to original source...
  22. Pratt, M., Macera, C. A., & Blanton, C. (1999). Levels of physical activity and inactivity in children and adults in the United States: Current evidence and research issues. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31(11, Suppl), 526-533. Go to original source...
  23. Sigmund, E., Zacpal, J., Sigmundová, D., Mitáš, J., Sklenář, V., Bělohlávek, R., & Frömel, K. (2007). Vyhodnocení IPAQ dotazníků pomocí formální konceptuální analýzy. Studia Kinanthropologica, 8(1), 7-16. Go to original source...
  24. Statsoft CR. (2007). Statistica Cz. Verze 8.0 [Computer software]. Praha: StatSoft.
  25. Vandelanotte, C., Bourdeaudhuij, R. P., Sjöström, M., & Sallis, J. (2005). Reliability and validity of a computerized and Dutch version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Journal of Physical Activity Health, 2, 63-75. Go to original source...
  26. Zhu, W. (2008). Let's keep walking. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(7, Suppl), 509-511. Go to original source...
  27. www.czso.cz
  28. www.ipaq.ki.se/ipaq.htm
  29. www.ipaq.ki.se/scoring.htm
  30. www.ipaq.ki.se/scoring.pdf
  31. www.ipenproject.org/surveyanews.htm

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.