Acta Gymnica 2016, 46(2):74-81 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2016.004
Functional clinical typology of the foot and kinematic gait parameters
- 1 Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic;
- 2 Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic;
- 3 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
Background: The foot plays a key role in a standing posture, walking and running performance. Changes in its structure or function may alter upper segments of kinematic chain which can lead to formation of musculoskeletal disorders. Although functional clinical typology provides a complex view of foot kinesiology there is a lack of knowledge and evidence about influences of different foot types on human gait.
Objective: The aim of the study was to analyse differences of kinematic gait parameters of lower extremity joints and pelvis between functional clinical foot types in healthy young men.
Methods: Three-dimensional kinematic analysis by the Vicon Motion Capture MX System device in synchronization with 2 Kistler force platforms was used to obtain kinematic data from 18 healthy men (mean age 23.2 ± 1.9 years). The functional clinical foot type was clinically examined and sorted into 3 basic foot type groups - forefoot varus (FFvar), rearfoot varus (RFvar) and forefoot valgus (FFvalg). Peak angular values and range of an angular displacement in all of three movement planes were analysed for pelvis, hip, knee and ankle joint. For statistical analysis of kinematic gait parameters differences between foot types Mann Whitney U test at a statistical significance level p < .05 and Cohen's coefficient d for effect size were used.
Results: This study showed that functional clinical foot type can affect kinematic parameters of gait in the joints of the lower limb and pelvis. Significant differences were presented in the FFvar in comparison with other two foot type groups with middle and high size of effect. The most alterations were observed in pelvis area and in a sagittal plane of movement. Nevertheless, significant differences between FFvalg and RFvar foot types were not noticed.
Conclusions: Functional clinical foot typology provides one of the possible methods to describe foot structure and function. Our results showed that foot type could alter gait. Forefoot varus foot type has more significant influence on kinematic gait parameters then other foot types. These effects should be considered by clinicians during examination of musculoskeletal system disorders especially in lower extremities.
Keywords: foot, functional typology, gait cycle, kinesiology, 3D kinematic analysis
Received: October 19, 2015; Accepted: February 24, 2016; Prepublished online: March 31, 2016; Published: June 30, 2016 Show citation
References
- Barton, C. J., Levinger, P., Crossley, K. M., Webster, K. E., & Menz, H. B. (2012). The relationship between rearfoot, tibial and hip kinematics in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clinical Biomechanics, 27, 702-705.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Betsch, M., Schneppendahl, J., Dor, L., Jungbluth, P., Grassmann, J. P., Windolf, J., … Wild, M. (2011). Influence of foot positions on the spine and pelvis. Arthritis Care & Research, 63, 1758-1765.
Go to original source...
- Billis, E., Katsakiori, E., Kapodistrias, C., & Kapreli, E. (2007). Assessment of foot posture: Correlation between different clinical techniques. Foot, 17, 65-72.
Go to original source...
- Buchanan, K. R., & Davis, I. (2005). The relationship between forefoot, midfoot and rearfoot static alignment in pain-free individuals. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 35, 559-566.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Buldt, A. K., Murley, G. S., Butterworth, P., Levinger, P., Menz, H. B., & Landorf, K. B. (2013). The relationship between foot posture and lower limb kinematics during walking: A systematic review. Gait & Posture, 38, 363-372.
Go to original source...
- Cornwall, M. E., McPoil, T. G., Fishco, W. D., Hunt, L., Lane, C., & O'Donnell, D. (2004). Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment. Foot & Ankle International, 25, 745-748.
Go to original source...
- Cote, K. P., Brunet, M. E., Gansneder, B. M., & Shultz, S. J. (2005). Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. Journal of Athletic Training, 40, 41-46.
Go to PubMed...
- Curran, S. A., & Dananberg, H. J. (2005). Future of gait analysis. A podiatric medical perspective. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 95, 130-142.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Daniels, T. L., Smith, J. W., & Ross, T. J. (1996). Varus malalignment of the talar neck. Its effect on the position of the foot and on subtalar motion. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - Series A, 78, 1559-1567.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Dylevský, I. (2009). Speciální kineziologie [Special kinesiology]. Prague, Czech Republic: Grada Publishing.
- Eslami, M., Tanaka, C., Hinse, S., Farahpour, N., & Allard, P. (2006). Effect of foot wedge positions on lower-limb joints, pelvis and trunk angle variability during single-limb stance. Foot, 16, 208-213.
Go to original source...
- Harradine, P., Bevan, L., & Carter, N. (2006). An overview of podiatric biomechanics theory and its relation to selected gait dysfunction. Physiotherapy, 92, 122-127.
Go to original source...
- Hillstrom, H. J., Song, J., Kraszewski, A. P., Hafer, J. F., Mootanah, R., Dufour, A. B., … Deland, J. T. (2013). Foot type biomechanics part 1: Structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait & Posture, 37, 445-451.
Go to original source...
- Hsi, W. L. (2016). Analysis of medial deviation of center of pressure after initial heel contact in forefoot varus. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 115, 203-209.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kapandji, I. A. (1987). The physiology of the joints: Annotated diagrams of the mechanics of the human joints. Volume 2: Lower limb (5th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone.
- Kirby, K. A. (2000). Biomechanics of the normal and abnormal foot. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 90, 1-5.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Lee, W. E. (2001). Podiatric biomechanics. An historical appraisal and discussion of the Root model as a clinical system of approach in the present context of theoretical uncertainty. International Journal of Podiatric Biomechanics, 18, 555-684.
- Lewit, K., & Lepšíková, M. (2008). Chodidlo - významná část stabilizačního systému [Foot - a significant part of the stabilization system]. Rehabilitace a fyzikální lékařství, 3, 99-104.
- McPoil, T. G., Knecht, H. G., & Schuit, D. (1988). A survey of foot types in normal females between the ages of 18 and 30 years. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 9, 406-409.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Michaud, T. C. (1997). Foot orthoses and other forms of conservative foot care. Newton, MA: Thomas C. Michaud.
- Miller, M., & McGuire, J. (2000). Literature reveals no consensus on subtalar neutral. Biomechanics, 7, 63-74.
- Mooney, J., & Campbell, R. (2006). General foot disorders. In D. Lorimer, G. French, M. O'Donnell, J. Gordon Burrow, & B. Wall (Eds.), Neale's disorders of the foot (7th ed., pp. 89-164). London, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone.
- Neumann, D. A. (2010). Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system. Foundations for rehabilitation (2nd ed.). Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby.
- Nester, C. J. (2009). Lessons from dynamic cadaver and invasive bone pin studies: Do we know how the foot really moves during gait? Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 2, 18.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ozer, C. M. (2012). Evaluation of the sole morphology of professional football players. International Sport & Medicine Journal, 13, 8-17.
- Perry, J., & Burnfield, J. M. (2010). Gait analysis. Normal and pathological function (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
- Razeghi, M., & Batt, M. E. (2002). Foot type classification: A critical review of current methods. Gait & Posture, 15, 282-291.
Go to original source...
- Rodrigues, P., Chang, R., TenBroek, T., van Emmerik, R., & Hamill, J. (2015). Evaluating the coupling between foot pronation and tibial internal rotation continuously using vector coding. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 31, 88-94.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Root, M. L., Orien, W. P., Weed, J. H., & Hughes, R. J. (1971). Biomechanical evaluation of the foot. Los Angeles, CA: Clinical Biomechanics Corporation.
- Scott, G., Menz, H. B., & Newcombe, L. (2007). Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait & Posture, 26, 68-75.
Go to original source...
- Souza, R. B., Draper, C. E., Fredericson, M., & Powers, C. M. (2010). Femur rotation and patellofemoral joint kinematics: A weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 40, 277-285.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Tiberio, D. (1988). Pathomechanics of structural foot deformities. Physical Therapy, 68, 1840-1849.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Valmassy, R. L. (Ed.). (1996). Clinical biomechanics of the lower extremities. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
- Vařeka, I. (2004). Pronace/everze v subtalárním kloubu vyvolaná flexí v kolenním kloubu v uzavřeném kinematickém řetězci [Pronation/eversion of the subtalar joint induced flexion of the knee in a closed kinematic chain]. Rehabilitace a fyzikální lékařství, 11, 163-168.
- Vařeka, I., & Vařeková, R. (2008). The height of the longitudinal foot arch assessed by Chippaux-Šmiřák index in the compensated foot types according to Root. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica 38(1), 35-41.
- Vařeka, I., & Vařeková, R. (2009). Kineziologie nohy [Kinesiology of the foot]. Olomouc, Czech Republic: Palacký University Olomouc.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.