Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2006 36(4): 47-51

Somatic analysis of PE students within a four-year research period

Petr Kutáč, Vojtěch Gajda
Pedagogical Faculty, Ostrava University, Ostrava

Modern theories and studies interpret sport performance as a defined system of elements which are characterized as components, determiners, factors, etc. Somatic factors concerning the support system are supposed to be a significant factor group. Body height, weight, length, width and circuit measurements belong to the group of somatic factors and they determine physical build (frequently characterized by a somatotype). This paper deals with the physical build of 1st year PE students who can be considered a selected group of the population with a relatively large volume of physical activity. The research was carried out within the years 2001-2004, 265 students (166 men and 99 women) were included in a sample. Heath and Certer's method (Riegerová & Ulbrichová, 1993) was used to determine the somatotype. As for average somatotypes, no significant differences concerning PE students were noted during the consequent years of research. The only exception was perhaps the endomorphic component which proved a distinctively downward trend (the value approached statistical significance at α = 0.05). PE students can be regarded as a group of the population with a large volume of physical activity, therefore a significant development of physical build as well as a somatotype reaching an optimum somatotype for PE students can be expected to be present (Riegerová & Ulbrichová, 1993). However, the measurements proved that students had fallen behind, especially in the mesomorphic component, which correlates with the population normative. We do assume that our findings and results may prove a decreasing physical level and related somatic development in our population.

Keywords: PE students, somatotype, optimal somatotype, individual sportspersons, PE

Prepublished online: February 9, 2009; Published: September 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kutáč, P., & Gajda, V. (2006). Somatic analysis of PE students within a four-year research period. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica36(4), 47-51
Download citation

References

  1. Belej, J., & Gáborová, M. (1981). Motorika a somatický profil poslucháčov telesnej výchovy na pedagogickej fakulte UPJŠ v Prešove. In J. Riegerová (Ed.), Sborník prací konference Osobnost učitele tělesné výchovy (pp. 492-501). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
  2. Bláha, P. et al. (1986). Antropometrie československé populace od 6 do 55 let. Praha: Ústřední štáb Československé spartakiády 1985.
  3. Dovalil, J. (2002). Výkon a trénink ve sportu. Praha: Olympia.
  4. Pavlík, J. (1999). Tělesná stavba jako faktor výkonnosti sportovce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  5. Riegerová, J. (1994). Studium změn somatotypu dětí v období puberty (longitudinální sledování). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
  6. Riegerová, J., & Ulbrichová, M. (1993). Aplikace fyzické antropologie v tělesné výchově a sportu (příručka funkční antropologie). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
  7. Riegerová, J., Přidalová, M., Vařeková, R., & Vodička, P. (1995). Hodnocení tělesné stavby studentů 1. ročníku FTK UP. In J. Riegerová (Ed.), Sborník II. celostátní konference v oboru zdravotní TV a funkční antropologie Diagnostika pohybového systému: metody prevence, primární prevence, prostředky pohybové terapie (pp. 41-48). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
  8. Štěpnička, J., Chytráčková, J., Kasalická, V., & Kubrychtová, I. (1979). Somatické předpoklady ke studiu tělesné výchovy. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.