Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica, 2006 (vol. 36), issue 2

Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2006 36(2): 39-46

Elective performance enhancement surgery for athletes: Should it be resisted?

Mark Hamilton
Ashland University, Ashland

The following article describes some surgeries used to enhance athletic performance along with discussion of possible ones that could be used in the upcoming years for this purpose. Elective eye surgery is used by numerous athletes in sports where sight is an essential aspect of success. This raises the ethical question of whether it is morally acceptable to perform enhancement surgery for the purpose of developing capabilities that are superior to normal, such as 20/10 vision. Criteria to determine the morality of these actions is necessary, especially when the surgery is optional and is motivated not by therapeutic needs but to enhance performance and to create an ability above and beyond the norm. It is one thing to have corrective surgery for convenience's sake or to slow down deterioration, but it is quite another to do it to create superior vision, such as 20/10. With the acceptance of this rather benign eye surgery and due to the advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, the crackdown on steroid usage, and the growing financial incentives for athletes, it is only a matter of time before this evolves into athletes having elective surgeries to become bigger, stronger, or faster. Elective surgery will expand in its usage to enhance performance. This raises a plethora of moral issues, therefore there must be serious pursuit of criteria to evaluate the morality of this type of elective surgery and encouragement of athletic institutions to be proactive in policy making. Finally, there is discussion on whether a solution can begin to be found in transhumanism, in a pragmatic approach or in returning to an essentialist view of human nature.

Keywords: Athletic performance enhancement, ergogenic aids, elective surgery, doping

Prepublished online: February 13, 2009; Published: March 1, 2006

Download citation

References

  1. Bostrom, N. (2001). Transhumnist values. Retrieved from World Wide Web www.nickbostrom.com
  2. Dodd, M. (2005). Tommy John surgery: Pitcher's Best Friend. USA Today, March 28.
  3. Henderson, J. (2002). The Observer, February 3.
  4. Holowchak, A. M. (2002). Ergogenic aids and human performance. Journal of Philosophy of Sport, 74-85.
  5. Hui, S. (2004). Olympics: Triumphant result for transsexuals. Sports, 2(118).
  6. IOC Embraces Transsexuals for Olympics. (2004). People's Daily Online, May 20.
  7. Johnson, S. (2005). A cut above. Wired magazine, March.
  8. Kelley, J. (2004). IOC Embraces Transsexuals. Retrieved from World Wide Web www.thesakeofargument
  9. Lewis, C. S. (1947). The abolition of Man.
  10. Macdonald, D., & Crytser, T. Virtual trainer: Arm pump. Racer X online, 1.
  11. McGovern, C. (2002). Abortion can be used to boost athletic performance. Report news magazine, February.
  12. Miah, A. (2001). Genetic technologies and sport. Journal of Philosophy of Sport, 1.
  13. Miah, A. (2003). Be very afraid: Cyborg athletes, transhuman ideals, and posthumanity. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 13.
  14. Miah, A. (2005). The beam in your eye - LASIK. Blog site created by Miah.
  15. Neuer, C. (2005). Brock sellards unplugged. Dirt rider magazine, May 30.
  16. Saletan, W. (2005). The beam in your eye. Slate magazine. April 18.
  17. Suits, B. (1988). Tricky triad. Journal of Philosophy of Sport, 2.
  18. Transhumanism and posthumanism. Encyclopedia of Bioethics (3rd ed.).
  19. Transexual golfer confusing golf world (2004). Retrieved from World Wide Web www.yellowworld.org
  20. Transexual tees off at pro event (2004). Retrieved from World Wide Web www.cbsnews.com